Happy New Year, Dwarf Style
The new Hobbit movie, The Desolation of Smaug, has hit theaters and caused a sensation. All of a sudden, it’s all about the dwarves – and I can see why! Richard Armitage is every inch (if short) a king, and the antics of his merry band are heartwarming and, at times, romantic.
I saw an interview with Irish actor Aidan Turner, where he was asked about the relationship between his character, the Dwarf Kili, and the Elven warrior Tauriel. The romance never took place in the book, so why the movie? He makes the point that it adds depth to the characters and it’s an important aspect of the overall story. I couldn’t agree more! I was rooting for his character and for Tauriel to catch up to him when he was wounded, and there’s even the potential for a love triangle because our favorite elf Legolas fancies Tauriel. Oh nos!
What do you think when directors change a classic story in order to tell a modern tale? Not that romance is modern, in any particular; it’s a story as old as time itself. But should a director add an element that isn’t there in the books, in order to please modern viewers? Some fans of Robert Ludlum lament that the immensely popular Jason Bourne movie franchise aren’t true to the books. But the movies are good movies, enjoyable and fast-paced. I would argue that Peter Jackson has done the same with the Hobbit and deepened the tale, enriching it and telling more of the story as it could have been.
What’s your opinion? Change away, or leave it the way it is thankyouverymuch? I’d love to know in the comments!